Years ago I read The Hard About Hard Things by Ben Horowitz.
Itās a good book. If youāre running a company itās a cathartic listen.
Hereās what stood out to me in the book:
Ben Horowitz and Marc Andreesen have built 2 billion dollar companies (Loud Cloud $1.6Bn sale to EDS + Netscape $4Bn sale to AOL). They have also started one of the largest and most prolific VC firms in the world called Andreesen Horowitz.
According to the book, Marc and Ben will argue viciously in front of other employees over investments. Even when they agree, one of them will practice taking the opposite side and arguing it. He finds the act of doing this makes them better investors and teaches others the value of active disagreement.
Iāve observed similar behaviors from other great investors like John D. Rockefeller (Standard Oil) and Warren Buffett (Berkshire Hathaway).
John D Rockefeller had a business partner named Henry Flager.
In his biography (Titan), we learn that they lived near each other, and every day they would walk to work. The author notes they spent hours each day actively talking about their plans and strategies.
Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger famously had a magnetic relationship from day one. They often spoke daily, for hours at a time on all types of topics.
It seems like the best investors Iāve read about share a key similarity.
They find a knowledgeable partner to spar with, and they spar with them daily.
The act of an investor speaking (or writing) your ideas, and having someone to fine tune them is comparable to Michelangelo taking a block of hard marble, and chiseling it for years to produce the David sculpture.
When you have an idea, thatās always the first version of it.
Letās call that V1.
As an investor, you only get 1 shot at making your decision. Either you invest, or you donāt.
When youāre building a company, you can launch a product, sometimes called an MVP (minimum viable product), then youāre able to iterate on it based on what you learn.
As an investor, you donāt have that luxury.
Once you make an investment, you have to live with that decision whether it was good or bad.
To make a good decision, you need to go from a V1 idea to a V100 over time.
The way Iāve observed people get there (myself, Warren, and Ben included) is to talk to other smart people about and debate it actively.
Assume with each conversation, your thinking evolves by 0.5 or 1 version.
This means if I havenāt had 100 conversations about an investment, Iām not ready to do it.
Active Debate
My business partner and I Xavier are both happy to take both sides of an investment and debate it ruthlessly. Perhaps most importantly, we respect each other deeply (I wrote about this in a previous issue on āHow to Disagreeā).
We know there is no outcome where one of us gets our feelings hurt in a disagreement.
The point of our conflict is to get to the best possible answer about how to invest our shareholderās money.
In all my companies Iāve had very smart people that work with me, but Iāve rarely experienced the type of healthy conflict Iām able to have with Xavier.
It got me thinkingā¦how can I get people to take a stand and argue their ideas?
Iām surrounded by smart people. I want to hear their ideas!
It will make me a better investor.
And it will make our company more successful.
Most people will disagree quietly.
Disagreement at companies often passes like ships in the night.
Conflict saves lives. I want conflict in the workplace.
But, disagreeing and creating conflict is scary.
Here are some reasons why I think people donāt do it:
From my experience, if youāre working in a healthy workplace with a good boss, the following things are true:
-Speaking up and disagreeing will move your career forward
-Taking a stand is a sign of leadership. If you believe in something, and you get buy-in from your peers on that idea, you will get rewarded.
-Experts are a fallacy, nobody knows everything. Also, assume that each person has a very limited lens on any discussion.
-Good experts welcome debate. Any real expert will appreciate debate in order to come to a better knowledge of a topic. Experts who donāt welcome debate are false experts and should be avoided.
Finally, there are two things Iād like to close with here brieflyā¦
For Leadership š How do you cultivate disagreement in the workplace?
Andy Grove, former Intel CEO, would say, āI want to ask you a favor. Itās a big one, and it is the most important thing you can do for me. I really need you to tell me what I am doing wrong, how I am screwing up.ā
For employees š How do you practice good conflict?
A safe place to test your new disagreement muscle is in 1on1s with your manager.
Then once you get comfortable you can disagree in a more fluid, open meeting setting whenever you feel like it.
If you donāt have 1on1s, you should schedule it once a month or at least once a quarter with your manager.
Some tools you may use:
āTo the readers. What do you think? Is workplace conflict helpful? Harmful? Would love to hear your experience with it.
When asked why nobody has recreated Buffettās success, their answer is ānobody wants to get rich slowā.
Leverage is a way to get rich fast. Itās also the way to lose everything fast, which is why Charlie and Warren stay away from it.
Most people overcomplicate entrepreneurship in their mind, and therefore they never try it.
Running a business is as simple as
You donāt need to be rich to do it. Above Nick and his wife used chalk to generate attention for his first business.
You donāt need to overcomplicate it.
If you live in the US, I hope you had a nice Thanksgiving last week. š¦
Have a great week,
Sieva
ā